In the
proceeding months and years after the 2009 Colgan Air Flight 3407 crash and
various others, the FAA came to conclusion that something in the regulatory
process must be changed. Previously, pilots were landing jobs with a little
over the minimum of 250 hours and no ATP due to it not being required. This
meant flight crews were severely under-experienced. The FAA instituted the 1500
requirement for the ATP, unless you came from a 141 school, where you are
eligible to get the restricted ATP with 1000. With proper military experience,
this can be possible with even less. Not only was flight time changed, but rest
requirements were too. According to The Balance and FAA, Under the old rules,
rest requirements were based on operations such as domestic and international
flights. Now there is no difference as all rules apply. Flight hours were
limited per day and per year with the old rules and now it are based of week,
month, and year. Under old operating rules, the word “fit for duty” had a very
vague language around it. Currently pilots must sign a document affirming that
they are unable to fly and the company must remove the pilot if they are
fatigued.
Technically speaking,
cargo carriers are exempt from Part 117, but they could operate under those
rules if they wish. Flight time and rest requirements are based on various
different things. For 121 supplemental cargo operations, these rules relate to
how many hours are operated in any calendar year, month, and day with a minimum
8 hour required rest period, pertaining to how long the operating day was and
what kind of crew it was (standard, double, ect.). Every seven days, operating
crews must get a 1/7 status (24 hours of duty rest, for a 7 day duty period).
Cargo carriers have
been excluded from the Part 117 rules for various reasons. The main reason is
these cargo carriers are working non-stop around the clock. If said company was
to abide by part 117, they would lose out on huge amounts of revenue. Not only
that, but with the pilot shortage that is among us today it would almost be
impossible. In the month of October,
2017, Part 121 cargo company Kalitta Air, LLC flew 6,332.1 hours, the busiest
month they have ever had. If they were to partake in these rules, there is no
way they would have been able to achieve that astonishing record. Not only
would it affect smaller companies, but it would affect the industry as a whole.
According to the FAA and USA Today, “the economic
rationale behind exempting cargo pilots, saying it would cost the industry $550
million to comply, outweighing safety benefits. Originally, it said the rules
would cost an additional $214 million.”
Personally,
no I don’t think cargo carriers should be included in the new rules. As stated
they can if they chose, but it could slow their success. Internally, these
cargo carriers outside of Part 117 spend months contracting exceptional rest period
requirments with union pilots that leave everyone pleased. For example, if you
were operating a duty period up to 24 hours, you automatically get 18 a minimum
rest period of 18 consecutive hours and so on.
If
cargo carriers were included in the new rules, it wouldn’t matter what industry
you went in. If you wanted more stable of a schedule, a lot of these cargo
pilots would be joining the airline. On the other hand, cargo carriers like to
have pilots on for half the month, then off half the month, so these schedules
would likely change as well.
Sources:
Carroll, J. R. (2014, March 13). UPS pilots urge more rest
for cargo crews. Retrieved February 02, 2018, from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/03/13/ups-pilots-urge-more-rest-for-cargo-crews/6402615/
Advisory Circulars & Guides Associated with 14 CFR Part
117. (2017, October 16). Retrieved February 02, 2018, from https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/agc/practice_areas/regulations/part117/Part117_General/
Houston, S.
(n.d.). Learn About the FAA's Final Rule for Pilot Duty and Rest Requirements.
Retrieved February 02, 2018, from
https://www.thebalance.com/faa-final-rule-pilot-duty-and-rest-requirements-282927
I personally think it would be worth it for the cargo carriers to join the airline pilots and have similar schedules because I feel like it would encourage more people to fly. I asked a few pilots at my job why they chose the airline industry over cargo, and the single most common answer I'd get was that they could be off more to take care of the kids. While lifestyle is a major part of it, I think the cargo lifestyle could improve as well.
ReplyDelete