Skip to main content

ATC Privatization

Over the years, the airspace above has been getting more sophisticated, yet safer. Currently, our system is divided into 21 sections covering 5,282,000 square miles of Domestic U.S. Airspace and 24,101,568 square miles of U.S. Oceanic Airspace. Major components of this include the traffic flow management system; Time based flow management, and en route automation modernization (FAA, 2018). The system implemented now is radar based and uses a transponder between ATC and other aircrafts to display location and altitude with a short delay in the relay. NextGen is a FAA led modernization of our air transportation system to increase the safety, efficiency, capacity, and resiliency (FAA, 2018). NextGen is satellite based and will allow pilots, controllers, and operators to gain better information that help the aircraft get from point A to B faster, while consuming less fuel, and will be more efficient. NextGen is on target to have all components in place by 2025.

The biggest reason why traditional GA has spoken against the privatization of ATC is due to the cost that it will intel. These GA aircraft will have to be installed with the ADS-B equipment that will cost additional thousands of dollars per aircraft. Sarasota Avionics sells ADS-B packages ranging from $2,000 to $2,500. On the other hands, US carriers are all for implementing ADS-B. It would still be costly to install it on existing aircraft along with future aircraft, but it will provide more efficient and increasing capacity and safety among the airlines. Overall, it will result in more revenue in the industry. Aviation Organization AOPA posted a link calling for members to ask congress to oppose privatization (AOPA.org, 2017). Also, my other favorite organization that I belong to, EAA, also opposes the privatization of ATC (EAA.org, 2016).

According to Aero Space America, Canada uses Nav Canada, a nonprofit company that owns and runs Canada’s civil air navigation system. The U.S. airline industry and congress use Nav Canadas structure as a model so responsibility and control can be shifted away from the FAA. Ever since 1987, New Zealand, Germany, Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom have switched from government owned, government models to public private partnerships using user fees to cover cost. France has kept its air navigation agency in the government (Aerospace America, 2017). Currently, privatized ATC has been proved to be slightly more efficient compared to the United States, but at the same time those that are privatized overseas are much smaller and less busy than Americas.

For NextGen to be integrated into the system, it must go through a series of amends and revises through congress. According to Congress, the bill amends the version of aviation reauthorization act to revise contents of annual DOT report to congress regarding an integrated work plan for NextGen. The bill is then revised multiple times and stages. It has to be an act of Congress that can make this decision on its own. Trumps current administration was to push NextGen into place, privatization ATC.

Personally, I am for it if it can boost safety and efficiency in the overall industry. The only thing I am worried about is the cost. I really haven’t been able to wrap my head around the whole process to see the big picture. Its understood the main changes that will happen, but what else could be beneficial. So if it will improve our safety significantly and not put a hole in my wallet, I am for it.

Citation:
Privatizing air traffic control. (2017, May 31). Retrieved April 07, 2018, from https://aerospaceamerica.aiaa.org/features/privatizing-air-traffic-control/
DeFazio, P., & Larsen, R. (2017, May 10). The case against privatizing the nation's air traffic control system. Retrieved April 07, 2018, from http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/transportation/332684-the-case-against-privatizing-the-nations-air-traffic
D., & S. (2017, February 06). S.320 - 115th Congress (2017-2018): NextGen Accountability Act. Retrieved April 07, 2018, from https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/320
Where We Are Now. (2018, February 25). Retrieved April 07, 2018, from https://www.faa.gov/nextgen/where_we_are_now/

Comments

  1. FourthGenFlyingApril 7, 2018 at 6:03 PM

    Great job including those details about the U.S. airspace specifications. In my research, I found that our airspace system has three times the traffic of the next sized airspace, China, so it's apples to oranges in any comparison. You cited ADS-B as the biggest reason that GA opposed privatization, but ADS-B is already an FAA mandate. It is going to be required by January 1, 2020 under the current mandate, and has nothing to do with privatization. You were right in mentioning cost. The cost that GA is worried about is primarily user fees. The old NAS system of ground-based navigation aids are on their way out, ADS-B and GPS are the way of the future.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Final Blog

For my final blog in this Aviation Senior Seminar course, I want to expand on my past blog that was all for the push of commercial space travel, and really give out how beneficial it could be to mankind. According to Forbes, the main objective of privatizing commercial space travel isn’t to just hand over space travel to the private sector, but expand upon the utilization of travel by space by finding different companies and opportunities where a private sector or sectors could benefit from ( www.forbes.com , Who’s Winning In the Commercial Space Race?). The first main con that comes from this is that it allows smaller private companies to provide a business for the government in a way both can benefit from. For example, NASA really hasn’t launched its own rocket in years, along with shutting down its shuttle program back in 2011 due to government funding.  This was the first major break in United States history allowing a privatized company to get the opportunity to compete i...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Commercial Space Industry

Between the 1960s and 1980s, U.S. companies manufactured and produced various launch vehicles and satellites to be under NASA contracts to launch their payloads. According to the FAA, in the late 80’s the need for launches grew to the point where NASA could no longer handle the demand and manufactures expressed interest in commercial launch services. In 1982, Space Services successfully launched the first private American launch testing its prototype Conestoga rocket. This flight also proved how the approval process takes an extraordinary long time. Shortly after the first test launch, Charles D. Walker from McDonnell Douglas became the first non-government astronaut to fly in 1984. This manned flight led to a huge spark in the future of space tourism. Various companies started designing and engineering cabins that could hold individuals and payloads. NASA allowed its first citizen to fly during the shuttle program, Christa McAuliffe. NASA predicted that after this flight two to three...
1 comment
Read more